Δορυφορική
Θέλετε να αντιδράσετε στο μήνυμα; Φτιάξτε έναν λογαριασμό και συνδεθείτε για να συνεχίσετε.
Αναζήτηση
Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
Σύνθετη Αναζήτηση
Κοινωνική Δικτύωση
Κοινωνική Δικτύωση reddit      




Επισημάνετε και μοιραστείτε την διεύθυνση του Δορυφορική στην σελίδα κοινωνικής δικτύωσης σας
Οι κορυφαίες λέξεις κλειδιά που έχουν επισημανθεί.
Ποστ με τις περισσότερες αντιδράσεις του μήνα
Δημοσιεύτηκε από Διαχειριστής στο Νίκο σ' ενδιαφέρει!
( 1 )
Νοέμβριος 2024
ΔευΤριΤετΠεμΠαρΣαβΚυρ
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Ημερολόγιο

Κορυφαίοι συγγραφείς
26412 Δημοσιεύσεις - 93%
1732 Δημοσιεύσεις - 6%
syndr (302)
302 Δημοσιεύσεις - 1%
48 Δημοσιεύσεις - 0%
25 Δημοσιεύσεις - 0%
3 Δημοσιεύσεις - 0%
3 Δημοσιεύσεις - 0%
2 Δημοσιεύσεις - 0%
Elytis (2)
2 Δημοσιεύσεις - 0%
JimFit (2)
2 Δημοσιεύσεις - 0%
Κορυφαίοι συγγραφείς της εβδομάδας
73 Δημοσιεύσεις - 97%
2 Δημοσιεύσεις - 3%
Στατιστικά
Τα μέλη μας είναι συνολικά 50Το νέο μέλος στις συζητήσεις μας είναι ο/η PanagiotisΤα μέλη μας έχουν δημοσιεύσει συνολικά 30081 θέματασε 25778 θέματα
Σύνδεση

Πήγαινε κάτω
Διαχειριστής
Διαχειριστής
Admin
Αριθμός μηνυμάτων : 26412
Ημερομηνία εγγραφής : 29/10/2010
http://kafetzi-gr.webnode.gr

What normal Americans — not AI companies — want for AI Empty What normal Americans — not AI companies — want for AI

22/8/2023, 11:40


What normal Americans — not AI companies — want for AI Circuit_board_GettyImages_508429743.0Getty Images
Sigal Samuel is a senior reporter for Vox’s Future Perfect and co-host of the Future Perfect podcast. She writes primarily about the future of consciousness, tracking advances in artificial intelligence and neuroscience and their staggering ethical implications. Before joining Vox, Sigal was the religion editor at the Atlantic.

Finding the best ways to do good.


Five months ago, when I published a big piece laying out the case for slowing down AI, it wasn’t exactly mainstream to say that we should pump the brakes on this technology. Within the tech industry, it was practically taboo.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has argued that Americans would be foolish to slow down OpenAI’s progress. “If you are a person of a liberal-democratic country, it is better for you to cheer on the success of OpenAI” rather than “authoritarian governments,” he told the Atlantic. Microsoft’s Brad Smith has likewise argued that we can’t afford to slow down lest China race ahead on AI.
But it turns out the American public does not agree with them. A whopping 72 percent of American voters want to slow down the development of AI, compared to just 8 percent who prefer speeding up, according to new polling from the think tank AI Policy Institute.
The poll, conducted by data analytics firm YouGov, surveyed 1,001 Americans from across the age, gender, and political spectrum: 42 percent of respondents affiliated themselves with Donald Trump and 47 percent with Joe Biden. The racial breakdown was a bit less representative: 73 percent of respondents identified as white, 12 percent as Black, and 7 percent as Hispanic. Most respondents did not have a college degree.
Jack Clark, the CEO of AI safety and research company Anthropictook note of the survey in his popular newsletter. “These results are interesting because they appear to show a divergence between elite opinion and popular opinion,” he wrote. Specifically, “this survey shows that normal people are much more cautious in their outlook about the technology and more likely to adopt or prefer a precautionary principle when developing the tech.”
Americans are clearly voicing their wish for AI — slow down! — and it’s important for policymakers to know that this is what their constituents want. That could embolden them to adopt badly needed policies that promote more caution on AI. After all, this tech has the potential to do serious harm, like spreading disinformation that could impact elections. Washington’s job is to protect the interests of American voters, not those of Big Tech execs who seek to wield enormous power despite never having been democratically elected.

RELATED

Finally, a realistic roadmap for getting AI companies in check



Moving toward “zero trust” AI governance


Here’s another striking finding from the AI Policy Institute’s polling: 82 percent of American voters don’t trust AI companies to self-regulate.
To Sarah Myers West, managing director for the research center AI Now Institute, this public distrust is both appropriate and unsurprising. “I think people have learned from the past decade of tech-enabled crises,” she told me. “It’s quite clear when you look at the evidence that self-regulatory approaches don’t work.”

_________________
What normal Americans — not AI companies — want for AI 3_eaay31
Επιστροφή στην κορυφή
Δικαιώματα σας στην κατηγορία αυτή
Μπορείτε να απαντήσετε στα Θέματα αυτής της Δ.Συζήτησης